màj wiki avec retour MES lot-5 AD
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Robotics Project Lifecycle (DTR, Planning, Tests, Roles)"
|
||||
type: operation
|
||||
sources:
|
||||
- sources/archives/Organisation_projet_Robotique.md
|
||||
- sources/archives/Planning_Installation_Miniload.md
|
||||
- sources/archives/DTR_configuration_reseau_materiel.md
|
||||
- sources/archives/Documents_utiles.md
|
||||
- sources/archives/Plan_tests_stations.md
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- architecture/galileo-integration.md
|
||||
- operations/galileo-simulation.md
|
||||
- operations/galileo-troubleshooting.md
|
||||
- operations/vm-installation.md
|
||||
- operations/vm-network-routing.md
|
||||
- operations/first-deployment.md
|
||||
- concepts/mechanical-elements.md
|
||||
- concepts/stations.md
|
||||
last_compiled: "2026-04-17"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Robotics Project Lifecycle (DTR, Planning, Tests, Roles)
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Robotics projects — installations with mechanized hardware (miniload, TK, conveyors, APS, AGV…) — require tighter coordination than pure-software projects because physical installation, electrical work and IT integration run in parallel. This page covers the organizational roles, reference documents, planning artifacts, and the station-test milestone that validates the WMS ↔ GALILEO configuration before go-live.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Project organization
|
||||
|
||||
A robotics project pulls in multiple Mecalux stakeholders:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Chef de chantier** — site supervisor for the mechanical build
|
||||
- **Chef de projet IT** — IT lead (WMS + automation integration)
|
||||
- **Responsable électricité** — electrical lead
|
||||
- **Responsable de projet** — master coordinator who aligns the above, owns the schedule, and guarantees everyone has the right information at the right time
|
||||
|
||||
The **Responsable de projet** is the single point of escalation; without them, gaps between disciplines (e.g. the rack is installed but the DTR has not been validated) lead to slippage.
|
||||
|
||||
> The canonical organisational diagram for a robotics project is on [Confluence — Organisation d'un projet Robotique](https://easywmsfrance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EF/pages/3000434425874).
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. DTR — Document Technique de Référence
|
||||
|
||||
The **DTR (Document Technique de Référence)** lists every technical element required for an automated installation — hardware, IP addresses, services, accounts — along with the **responsibility split between Mecalux and the client**.
|
||||
|
||||
The DTR answers "who provides what and by when":
|
||||
- WMS server specs and OS
|
||||
- Network segments (WMS LAN, PLC LAN, wireless for RF terminals)
|
||||
- IP allocations (WMS, Gateway, GALILEO PLCs, RF terminals, printers, scanners)
|
||||
- Services (Active Directory, DNS, NTP, SMTP)
|
||||
- Physical access and ports opened between segments
|
||||
|
||||
The DTR template lives on [Confluence — DTR configuration réseau et matériel](https://easywmsfrance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EF/pages/3000562515980) as a table format. Fill a copy per project; track outstanding client deliverables in Jira.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Planning (Miniload installation)
|
||||
|
||||
Two reference plannings used on every miniload project:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Global installation planning** — overview of all phases (civil works → rack install → electrical → PLC commissioning → WMS integration → tests → go-live)
|
||||
2. **IT ROB planning** — the slice owned by the IT Robotics team (VM install, WMS deploy, EasyS configuration, Gateway, station tests, Hypercare)
|
||||
|
||||
Both plannings live as Gantt images on [Confluence — Planning Installation Miniload](https://easywmsfrance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EF/pages/3000567955477). Copy the Gantt at project kick-off and adjust dates to site reality.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Reference documentation
|
||||
|
||||
| Document | Purpose | Location |
|
||||
|----------|---------|----------|
|
||||
| **Control_Communications_Interface_EN_GB.pdf** | All station types, event types, PIE flags | [MSSCC Automation docs](https://msscc.mecalux.com/documentation/Automation/master/ES/Documents/GalileoAWS/Control_Communications_Interface_EN_GB.pdf) |
|
||||
| **EasyWMSGateway_ControlInterface_EN.pdf** | Frame structure (low-level — used when a frame translation looks wrong) | [MSSCC services docs](https://msscc.mecalux.com/documentation/documentation/master/ES/docs_downloads/services/docs/EasyWMSGateway_ControlInterface_EN.pdf) |
|
||||
| **Stations index** | Station-specific behaviours and quirks | [MSSCC Stations index](https://msscc.mecalux.com/documentation/documentation/master/EN/areas/layout/stations/index.md) |
|
||||
|
||||
Use them as the source of truth when writing the functional spec / interface document with GALILEO.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Station test milestone
|
||||
|
||||
Before the first real container enters the installation, run the **Plan de tests des stations** to confirm that EasyWMS and GALILEO agree on every station, route, container type and height type.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 Container type / height type sync
|
||||
|
||||
Every support entering a TK must pass through a **PIE** first, which calibrates the support. GALILEO reports to the WMS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Barcode read
|
||||
- **Container Type** (PLC Container Type)
|
||||
- **Height Type** (PLC Height Type)
|
||||
|
||||
Both types are defined in EasyS via the **PLC Types** menu.
|
||||
|
||||
> ⚠️ On miniloads, container type and height are usually **coupled**. If GALILEO reads `PLCHeightType = 1`, the `PLCType` must also be `1`. Explicit coupling must be recorded in the interface document and cross-checked on site.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Station audit query
|
||||
|
||||
Run on the **writing** database to extract the WMS view of GALILEO stations and their coordinates:
|
||||
|
||||
```csharp
|
||||
Context.StationRoutes.Where(sr => sr.Manager.ToString() == "Galileo")
|
||||
.Select(sr => new {
|
||||
StationType = sr.StationTo.Type,
|
||||
StationNumber = sr.StationTo.Number,
|
||||
StationCode = sr.StationTo.Code,
|
||||
StationTypeName = sr.StationTo.Type.ToString(),
|
||||
X = sr.StationTo.RealLocations.Any() && sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate != null
|
||||
? sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate.X : 0,
|
||||
Y = sr.StationTo.RealLocations.Any() && sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate != null
|
||||
? sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate.Y : 0,
|
||||
StationSide = sr.StationTo.RealLocations.Any() && sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate != null
|
||||
? sr.StationTo.RealLocations.FirstOrDefault().LogicalCoordinate.Side : 0,
|
||||
AisleNumber = sr.StationTo.AisleNumber
|
||||
})
|
||||
// union with StationFrom — see full query on Confluence
|
||||
.OrderBy(sr => sr.StationType)
|
||||
.ThenBy(sr => sr.StationNumber)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Compare the result with the GALILEO program (`C:\<NomDuClient>\Programme\<installation>.mgp`) line by line.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.3 "Full" route checks
|
||||
|
||||
GALILEO must be able to push these routes as **status 3 = Full** (otherwise recirculation logic cannot work):
|
||||
|
||||
| Source type | Destination type |
|
||||
|-------------|------------------|
|
||||
| CME | TE (ME) |
|
||||
| PKE | PK |
|
||||
| ET | PS |
|
||||
|
||||
Verify during simulation by temporarily saturating each route and confirming the Gateway log shows the `3` status.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Pre-go-live checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Consolidated checklist merging what each phase must deliver:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] DTR signed by client and Mecalux (hardware, IPs, services provisioned)
|
||||
- [ ] VM installed, joined to the domain, reachable via VPN (see [VM Installation](vm-installation.md) / [VM Network Routing](vm-network-routing.md))
|
||||
- [ ] EasyWMS deployed (see [First Deployment](first-deployment.md))
|
||||
- [ ] EasyS layout matches the execution plan (racks, stations, routes, PLC Types)
|
||||
- [ ] Gateway installed, `tenantCode` + `TokenUser` configured, port 3000 open
|
||||
- [ ] Station test query matches GALILEO `.mgp` station list
|
||||
- [ ] PLC Container Type / PLC Height Type coupling validated in simulation
|
||||
- [ ] "Full" route checks passed (CME→TE, PKE→PK, ET→PS)
|
||||
- [ ] End-to-end flows validated in EasyS (PIE → Miniload → PK → PS)
|
||||
- [ ] Reject route + floor virtual route configured (no lost container)
|
||||
- [ ] Automation Dashboard wired up with the client's monitoring (see [Automation Dashboard](../modules/automation-dashboard.md))
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- [GALILEO Integration](../architecture/galileo-integration.md) — protocol reference
|
||||
- [Galileo Simulation](galileo-simulation.md) — EasyS bring-up, PIE injection, station sync
|
||||
- [Galileo Troubleshooting](galileo-troubleshooting.md) — log analysis, faults
|
||||
- [VM Installation](vm-installation.md) · [VM Network Routing](vm-network-routing.md) · [First Deployment](first-deployment.md)
|
||||
- [Mechanical Elements](../concepts/mechanical-elements.md) · [Stations & Routes](../concepts/stations.md)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user